|
|
| (66 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | = EUCD Review and Implementation Wiki =
| |
| | | | |
| − | == PURPOSE==
| |
| | | | |
| − | The purpose of this collaborative research effort is to identify best practice implementations of the [http://europa.eu.int/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&numdoc=32001L0029&model=guichett&lg=en European Union Copyright Directive (Directive 2001/29/EC)] as legislated by EU Member States and compile them in a report. It should include the IPR enforcement directive and others from the acquis.
| + | Das Grundversorgung2.0-Wiki ist [http://inkcloud.leuphana.de/wikis/grundversorgung/ umgezogen] |
| − | | + | |
| − | Examples of best practices include the following. <b>Slovenia</b> has the only EUCD implementation that allows circumvention for the exercise of copyright exceptions. <b>Switzerland</b> is not in the EU, but in its implementation of the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) is currently debating to allow circumvention as well. <b>Hungary</b> has (had?) mandatory collective management for the making available right (see von Lewinski). <b>France</b> had passed a Global License along the same line but ended up doing away with it. In <b>Sweden</b> links to copyright infringing materials are not illegal. <b>Germany</b> allows making available for educational purposes in its §52a.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The report will be ready for the [[http://wizards-of-os.org/ Wizards of OS 4]] on 14 - 16 September 2006 where a panel and a workshop will take place.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Preceding Work ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [http://www.euro-copyrights.org/ Euro-copyrights.org] by a pan-European network of young copyright scholars, striving to educate as many people as possible about the implementation of the European Copyright Directive and copyright laws on an objective and easy to understand way.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [http://wiki.ael.be/index.php/EUCD-Status EUCD-Status Wiki] by AEL Association Electronique Libre
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [http://www.fipr.org/copyright/guide/ Ian Brown (ed.), Implementing the European Union Copyright Directive, by-country report from 2003]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/media/eucd Urs Gasser, Michael Girsberger, Transposing the Copyright Directive: Legal Protection of Technological Measures in EU-Member States. A Genie Stuck in the Bottle?, November 2004]. An [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/media/eucd_materials update page] brings it up to June 2005.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [http://www.urheberrecht.org/topic/Info-RiLi/eu-members.php Link Collection] by the Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht Munich (in German / Stand vom 12. Juli 2004).
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Other resources ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * UNESCO's Collection of [http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/ev.php-URL_ID=14076&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html National Copyright Laws ]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/gowers Gowers Report], will review the current IP framework in the UK.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * Bernt Hugenholtz, [http://www.ivir.nl/publications/hugenholtz/opinion-EIPR.html Why the Copyright Directive is Unimportant, and Possibly Invalid.] Published in [2000] EIPR 11, p. 501-502
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * Kenneth D. Crews/ Jacque Ramos, [http://www.surf.nl/copyright/International_Comparative_Chart_ZwolleIII_1104.pdf Comparative Analysis of International Copyright Law Applicable to University Scholarship]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * iffro, [http://www.ifrro.org/upload/documents/EuropeanRROstudyfinal22June.pdf Study on Reproduction Rights Organisations (RROs) in European Countries] , Report, 22 June 2005
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ''European Commission''
| + | |
| − | * [http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/documents/documents_en.htm European Commission page on Copyright and Neighbouring Rights]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * Commission Staff Working Paper [http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/review/sec-2004-995_en.pdf on the review of the EC legal framework in the field of copyright and related rights] June 19, 2004
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * EDRI, FIPR, VOSN, [http://www.edri.org/files/edri_response_review.pdf Response to the European Commission consultation on the review of the "acquis communautaire" in the field of copyright and related rights] October 27, 2004
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [http://ec.europa.eu/comm/avpolicy/other_actions/content_online/index_en.htm European Charter on Film Online], best practices for industry, worst practices for privacy.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ''Technological Protection Measures''
| + | |
| − | * Wencke Bäsler, [http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/19/ Technological Protection Measures in the United States, the European Union and Germany, How much fair use do we need in the "Digital World"?, ] Virginia Journal of Law & Technology Vol. 8, Nr.13 (2003)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * Natalie Helberger et al., [http://www.ivir.nl/publications/helberger/INDICAREStateoftheArtReport.pdf Digital Rights Management and Consumer Acceptability], December 2004, INDICARE
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * Stefan Bechtold [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=732825 Digital Rights Management in the United States and Europe] American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 52, pp. 323-382, 2004
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * Gwen Hinze, EFF, [http://www.eff.org/IP/FTAA/?f=tpm_implementation.html Seven Lessons from a Comparison of the Technological Protection Measure Provisions of the FTAA, the DMCA, and recent bilateral Free Trade Agreements]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, House of Representatives, The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, [http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/laca/protection/report/fullreport.pdf Review of technological protection measures exceptions] Canberra, February 2006
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * DMCA Section 104 Report, [http://www.copyright.gov/reports/studies/dmca/sec-104-report-vol-1.pdf A Report of the Register of Copyrights Pursuant to § 104 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act] August 2001
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == The EUCD ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | {| border="1" cellpadding="2"
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | | [[Belgium]]
| + | |
| − | | [[Denmark]]
| + | |
| − | | [[Finland]]
| + | |
| − | | [[France]]
| + | |
| − | | [[Germany]]
| + | |
| − | | [[Greece]]
| + | |
| − | | ...
| + | |
| − | | ...
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | Art. 1. Scope
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | Art. 2. Reproduction right
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | Art. 3. Right of communication to the public
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | Art. 4. Distribution right
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | Art. 5. E&L 1. must: Temporary acts of reproduction
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | | Art. 5. E&L 2. may: a. reproductions on paper
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | | Art. 5. E&L 2. may: b. private copy in any medium
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | | Art. 5. E&L 2. may: c. library copies
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | | Art. 5. E&L 2. may: d. ephemeral recordings by broadcasters
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |
| + | |
| − | |-
| + | |
| − | | etc.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | |}
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === 25 current EU members ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [[Belgium]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Denmark]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Finland]]
| + | |
| − | * [[France]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Germany]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Greece]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Luxembourg]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Netherlands]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Norway]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Portugal]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Spain]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Sweden]]
| + | |
| − | * [[United Kingdom]]
| + | |
| − | * ...
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === accession states ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [[Bulgaria]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Rumania]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Ukraine]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Serbia]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Macedonia]]
| + | |
| − | * ...
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === countries outside the EU implementing the WCT/WPPT ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [[Switzerland]]
| + | |
| − | * [[Australia]]
| + | |
| − | * [[USA]]
| + | |
| − | * ...
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Project Leads ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/urs_gasser Urs Gasser ]
| + | |
| − | * [http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/I.Brown/ Ian Brown ]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Contributors ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * ...
| + | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | + | ---- |
| | | | |
| | + | (and for an old project: [[EUCD Review and Implementation]]. Please don't touch these pages. Thank you.) |
| | | | |
| | | | |
