Difference between revisions of "Malta"
(→General Remarks on Implementation) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== General Remarks on Implementation == | == General Remarks on Implementation == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Malta is the only country which has transposed Art. 5 EUCD almost literally. Sec. 9(1)a of the Maltese Copyright Act of 2000 (Cap. 415) corresponds to Art. 5(1) EUCD; sec. 9(1)b-f correspond to Art. 5(2) EUCD; sec. 9(1)h-o and q-v correspond to Art. 5(3) EUCD; sec. 9(3) corresponds to the three step test of Art. 5(5) EUCD. Sec. 9(1)g and p can be subsumed under the “de minimis” exception of Art. 5(3)o EUCD, but are not of direct relevance to teaching and research. Art. 9(1)h Copyright Act states that copyright (inter alia) in a literary work shall not include the right to authorize or prohibit: | ||
| + | “the reproduction, translation, distribution or communication to the public of a work for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching or scientific research only to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, and as long as the source, including the author’s name, is, unless this is impossible, indicated.” | ||
| + | The only material difference from Art. 5(3)a EUCD is that the latter only limits the rights of reproduction (Art. 2 EUCD) and communication to the public respectively (Art. 3 EUCD), but not the right to distribute copies of works or to translate them. As far as our example is concerned, however, the scope of the exception is the same. | ||
| + | Like Art. 5(3)a EUCD, Art. 9(1)h Copyright Act is subject to the three step test (Art. 9(3) Maltese Copyright Act, Art. 5(5) EUCD). | ||
== Core Issues == | == Core Issues == | ||
Revision as of 22:38, 12 July 2006
Contents
Legislation and Materials
Act No. IX of 2003 - Official Maltese and English Texts
General Remarks on Implementation
Malta is the only country which has transposed Art. 5 EUCD almost literally. Sec. 9(1)a of the Maltese Copyright Act of 2000 (Cap. 415) corresponds to Art. 5(1) EUCD; sec. 9(1)b-f correspond to Art. 5(2) EUCD; sec. 9(1)h-o and q-v correspond to Art. 5(3) EUCD; sec. 9(3) corresponds to the three step test of Art. 5(5) EUCD. Sec. 9(1)g and p can be subsumed under the “de minimis” exception of Art. 5(3)o EUCD, but are not of direct relevance to teaching and research. Art. 9(1)h Copyright Act states that copyright (inter alia) in a literary work shall not include the right to authorize or prohibit: “the reproduction, translation, distribution or communication to the public of a work for the sole purpose of illustration for teaching or scientific research only to the extent justified by the non-commercial purpose to be achieved, and as long as the source, including the author’s name, is, unless this is impossible, indicated.” The only material difference from Art. 5(3)a EUCD is that the latter only limits the rights of reproduction (Art. 2 EUCD) and communication to the public respectively (Art. 3 EUCD), but not the right to distribute copies of works or to translate them. As far as our example is concerned, however, the scope of the exception is the same. Like Art. 5(3)a EUCD, Art. 9(1)h Copyright Act is subject to the three step test (Art. 9(3) Maltese Copyright Act, Art. 5(5) EUCD).
